Comments on: Python Logging Filters http://streamhacker.com/2010/04/08/python-logging-filters/#utm_source=feed&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=feed Weotta be Hacking Sun, 05 Feb 2012 22:47:34 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: xio http://streamhacker.com/2010/04/08/python-logging-filters/comment-page-1/#comment-721 xio Mon, 08 Nov 2010 06:27:00 +0000 http://streamhacker.com/?p=1098#comment-721 That was really helpful, thanks! OTL That was really helpful, thanks! OTL

]]> By: Vinay Sajip http://streamhacker.com/2010/04/08/python-logging-filters/comment-page-1/#comment-602 Vinay Sajip Fri, 09 Apr 2010 19:58:46 +0000 http://streamhacker.com/?p=1098#comment-602 Well, it's not always safe to assume there are any specific handlers for a logger at runtime, as the logging package allows for the logging configuration to be changed - sometimes on the fly. Still, when dictConfig lands, that will hopefully take away the need to do any working around missing package functionality. Well, it's not always safe to assume there are any specific handlers for a logger at runtime, as the logging package allows for the logging configuration to be changed – sometimes on the fly. Still, when dictConfig lands, that will hopefully take away the need to do any working around missing package functionality.

]]> By: Vinay Sajip http://streamhacker.com/2010/04/08/python-logging-filters/comment-page-1/#comment-548 Vinay Sajip Fri, 09 Apr 2010 12:58:46 +0000 http://streamhacker.com/?p=1098#comment-548 Jacob Perkins wrote, in response to Vinay Sajip: Jacob Perkins wrote, in response to Vinay Sajip:

]]> By: Jacob Perkins http://streamhacker.com/2010/04/08/python-logging-filters/comment-page-1/#comment-546 Jacob Perkins Thu, 08 Apr 2010 20:08:32 +0000 http://streamhacker.com/?p=1098#comment-546 Thanks, I didn't know about PEP 391 & dictConfig; it looks like a great improvement to fileConfig.<br><br>On the handlers attached to loggers, I was referring to the logger parent hierarchy, where you might have a child logger with no specific handlers itself, but whose parent's have handlers. So then the only programmatic way to find out which logger has the handler you're looking for is thru introspection. But dictConfig should clear that all up. Thanks, I didn't know about PEP 391 & dictConfig; it looks like a great improvement to fileConfig.

On the handlers attached to loggers, I was referring to the logger parent hierarchy, where you might have a child logger with no specific handlers itself, but whose parent's have handlers. So then the only programmatic way to find out which logger has the handler you're looking for is thru introspection. But dictConfig should clear that all up.

]]> By: Vinay Sajip http://streamhacker.com/2010/04/08/python-logging-filters/comment-page-1/#comment-545 Vinay Sajip Thu, 08 Apr 2010 19:55:19 +0000 http://streamhacker.com/?p=1098#comment-545 Your comment about a lack of support for filters in fileConfig is correct, but the new dictConfig API in Python 2.7 and Python 3.2 (see PEP 391) will support Filters in the configuration. Also, it should be clear which loggers handlers are attached to in a configuration: the handlers whose keys are in the handlers: value for a logger are attached to that logger. Your comment about a lack of support for filters in fileConfig is correct, but the new dictConfig API in Python 2.7 and Python 3.2 (see PEP 391) will support Filters in the configuration. Also, it should be clear which loggers handlers are attached to in a configuration: the handlers whose keys are in the handlers: value for a logger are attached to that logger.

]]>